For pet parents, pets are more than animals, they're family. So it might surprise you that, that in the eyes of the law, pets are regarded as property and have no rights of their own — but that's not to say that there aren't laws regarding pets.
In fact, most states have statutes concerning pet welfare. Laws are rapidly changing, though. More states and countries are beginning to recognize the importance of pets in the legal system. Let's discuss current laws regarding pet welfare and the progress being made to give pets the fundamental rights they deserve.
Although pets have no rights of their own, there are plenty of laws in effect to protect them from abuse and neglect. Let’s explore.
In the last 15 years, 35 states have adopted laws that make severe animal cruelty cases a felony. However, each state has different definitions of what animal abuse is. For instance, in Alaska, abuse is defined as, "Knowingly inflict(ing) severe physical pain or suffering; or with criminal negligence fail(ing) to care for an animal and causes its death or severe pain or prolonged suffering."
Arizona law is more specific, making it illegal to neglect, abandon, kill, or fail to provide medical treatment to a pet. Additionally, leaving an animal in a car without supervision is illegal under Arizona law. All 50 states plus DC share the same stance on dogfighting, making it a felony charge.
Currently, animal hoarding is only illegal in Illinois, though many municipalities in other states have restrictions on the number of animals in a single home.
At the time of writing, 23 states have restrictions on the chaining of animals. For many other states, whether the practice is legal is left up to the municipality to decide. Some municipalities ban the practice altogether, whereas others place restrictions on the chain length, chain type, and the amount of time a pet can spend on a chain.
Pets can also become involved with custody cases if their parents are married and decide to divorce. While pets were once regarded as property in divorce cases, nowadays, judges consider the dog's best interest. Still, judges will typically award custody to the guardian who paid the most money towards the dog's vet bills rather than who took care of the pet for the most part.
Before the 20th century, cats and dogs were valueless in the eyes of the law and didn't even qualify as property. As a result, pets could be killed or stolen with no legal avenue for their pet parents to find justice. The 20th century brought about many changes for pets and their parents, including the federal Animal Welfare Act of 1966, which ushered in changes on the state level to protect the well-being of pets nationwide.
Since then, much progress has been made both in America and internationally. In 2000, Boulder, Colorado formally changed the term "pet owner" to "pet guardian" as a symbolic measure to personify pets. In 2014, France changed animals' status from property to living beings, which was seen as a groundbreaking achievement in the eyes of animal rights activists. Since then, Quebec passed a bill that made pets legally equal to children under the law. Unfortunately, the US is not that progressive as of yet, and lawmakers have their reasons why.
US lawmakers are concerned that personifying pets could cause a slew of legal issues like leaving veterinarians subject to malpractice lawsuits just like human doctors. Likewise, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) worries that granting pets legal rights could cause vet care prices to skyrocket. What's more, granting pets personhood could open up a can of worms when it comes to breeding, spaying, and neutering — people could argue that these practices are done against the animals' will and cause lawsuits against the pet parents, veterinarians, or breeders involved.
Most states have laws securing pets' rights to food, water, and shelter, but many animal activists argue this isn't enough. However, granting pets personhood is a slippery slope. Giving pets the same rights as children has worked for other countries, but organizations like the AVMA worry that it could ignite a storm of legal issues.
As you can see, granting pets rights is a tricky situation. Most of us can probably agree that pets deserve fundamental necessities like shelter, veterinary care, food, and water, and to be free of abuse and neglect. Hopefully, one day all states will get on board with these laws and make pets a priority rather than property.